Development Budget 2010: Humane Vision with Reforms

Analyzing Government of India’s (GoI’s) annual budget is a challenging endeavor due to tapestry of flavors associated most of which are usually ideologically inclined and thus attracts a multitude of appreciation and flak simultaneously. Indian Budget 2010 pertains to social and financial inclusion of poor with a tinge of reforms.
Continuing the Vision:
• The budget 2010 maintains continuity of GoI’s vision of “prudential reforms” oriented economic growth with social equity.
• It reinforces GoI’s hybrid approach towards economic growth and social development along with a perceptible mix of welfare economics and neo liberal proclivity.
• This is in addition to the policy support for good governance initiatives like UIDAI and Technology advisory group for unique projects (TAGUP).
Flavors of Welfare State and Neoliberal Proclivity:
The USP of budget is a clear cut limelight on aam aadmi, mazdoor and kisan by bringing socio-economic convergences like MGNREGA and RSBY, setting up of National social security fund (NSSF), and extension of swavalambhan initiative under new pension scheme (NPS) concomitant to Bharat Nirman and other infrastructure development initiatives.
The four pronged strategy for krishi aur kissan (agriculture&farmers) which has once again brought a special focus to increase in agricultural credit and interest subversion of 2 per cent a is continuity of past legacy of UPA . What is remarkably different this time is special focus on storage infrastructure and food processing, which could be a public policy response to sporadic food inflation cycles in the country. All this arrow towards the flavors of a welfare state.
On the other hand three major announcements in the budget which went off relatively twilight are financial sector legislative reforms, GoI’s intent to open food retail sector and shift towards nutrient based fertilizer policy for containment of subsidy in the long term. These announcements are in a way pointers to the colors of “reforms”.
Financial Inclusion:
• Anticipated area for the actors of financial inclusion from this budget was support to financial inclusion initiatives and new emerging models which the Finance Minister has not left completely untouched.
• Enhancements to the corpus of financial inclusion fund and financial inclusion technology fund along with Government’s intention to take banking facilities to all habitations with 2000 plus population by 2012 by use of appropriate technologies and business correspondent model is a welcome announcement.

Ye Dil Maange More:
“More is better than less”.
Being a voracious consumer of government policies and programs I wish more have been incorporated in the budget, at least the two specific points: One related to livelihoods and other to microfinance.
• Incentives for actors of livelihood promotion in demographically and socially challenging terrains and a special fund to provide impetus to it.
• Public support to branchless banking and microfinance channels in terms of complete duty free imports of hand held and other devices in the case of the former and public infrastructure sharing and financial support for the latter to take financial services to challenging geographies and thus spur local entrepreneurship in strife torn states like Jammu and Kashmir, NE states would have been a cheery at the top of sarkari cake.
I leave you here and welcome your comments on this piece.


interesting to note that the six districts of Harayana state where FINO fintech foundation was implementation partner has the highest percentage of beneficiary enrollment which highlights FINO’s technology and implementation capabilities.
Recent Comments